Oh. I’m just providing an argument against items one and two on privacy alone. My reasons to block are just that: reasons. Did not mean to imply that I’d personally be the one blocking anything.
In my current situation: no.
Yes, but they aren’t always streamed digitally as they are currently.
Hey — sorry I mentioned this as reasons to block items one and two:
The new 272 Capp St. location is physically accessable.
You’re right — I don’t know what “x space is physically accessible” means, but am learning more-and-more through folks like you who bring it to our attention. It is much appreciated .
I felt the need to throw that in there to “stay on topic” for these items, but, clearly it was in error. I’m not bringing up my reasons to block based on any accessibility concerns.
My reasons to block are strictly around privacy reasons.
Again: sorry — I’m strictly focused on privacy here.
And yes: If my first post didn’t make that clear I would deny any request to live-stream any class over the internet irregardless of the persons situation. I value reading the room, prompting people, etc. If item two is passed I’d never teach at Noisebridge out of respect for the consensus process.
idk. imo: If we know a consensus will need future provisions it shouldn’t be passed? .
Wish I could make it without compromising my current situation. Can’t wait to interact with you irl, and, will disclose who I am (and reference these posts) when we meet up so I’m not just some “anonymous” person online.